Riverfront landowners share concerns about dioxin cleanup;
EPA-Dow agreement discussed
By Tony Lascari tlascari@mdn.net midland daily news
Published: Friday, November 6, 2009 9:08 AM EST
Local residents concerned about potential contamination cleanup work on their
riverfront properties spoke up Thursday at a U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency meeting at Saginaw Valley State University.
The EPA is considering creating a Superfund cleanup process for the
Tittabawassee River, Saginaw River and Saginaw Bay. The agency negotiated a
proposed agreement with The Dow Chemical Co. and Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality that will be under public review through Dec. 17.
The toxic chemical byproduct dioxin was released into the Tittabawassee River
from Dow’s Michigan Operations site in Midland, along with other contamination
that then spread downstream to the Saginaw River and Saginaw Bay.
The proposed agreement does not include specific cleanup work to be done, but in
it Dow agrees to develop a plan to determine the extent of contamination,
develop cleanup options and evaluate the performance and costs of the various
options. The proposal marks a potential coordinated cleanup process after
decades of delays.
David Bicigo, a homeowner on the Tittabawassee River, said he bought a few acres
of land on the river hoping to enjoy an outdoor lifestyle, but soon discovered
the property was contaminated.
“Over the years I don’t think the homeowners’ concerns have been addressed,” he
said, adding that he feels like the process has been dragged out.
Sam Shaheen, a local doctor and property owner along the river, said he’s never
seen direct health effects from dioxin or furan exposure in the community. He
said as a property owner on the Tittabawassee, he doesn’t want to see drastic
changes to his riverbank from any cleanup efforts.
Dow has tested various bank treatment options to stabilize eroding banks, which
can redistribute contamination into the system, including less invasive methods
such as tree trimming that wouldn’t scar the land. Specific cleanup options are
not being considered as part of the current agreement.
Richard Karl, EPA Region 5 Superfund Division director, said agency staff
members came to the meeting with an open mind and will re-evaluate the proposal
if needed based on public comments. He said the potential agreement is important
to the local environment and residents, adding it’s a big step forward in
getting cleanup at the site.
“The sooner we begin this work the sooner we can complete this work,” he said.
The proposal specifies work to be done by the EPA and MDEQ, with the EPA taking
a leadership role and the MDEQ retaining its authority to require further action
if it sees fit. Frank Ruswick, MDEQ senior policy adviser, said the EPA’s
requirements will likely meet the state’s needs in most cases.
“What we want to be able to avoid is the agencies not being able to reconcile
their differences,” he said.
EPA Region 5 Superfund Division Program Manager Wendy Carney said once an
agreement is in place, assessment work can begin quickly. She said high-use
properties such as homes and parks will begin to be investigated within 60 days
of an agreement being signed. Investigations of highly contaminated river bank
soil and sediment also can begin quickly.
Freeland resident Mike Kelly said there have been years of meetings on the topic
and there’s finally an agreement that the EPA and Dow feel will work well to
address the contamination.
“For the first time, I think there’s light at the end of the tunnel and I
encourage people to not delay at this point,” he said.
Leonard Heinzman, a property owner on the Tittabawassee in Freeland, said he’s
been bothered by the Lone Tree Council’s influence on the process, with the
local environmental group getting the public comment period extended 30 days and
getting a $50,000 technical assistant through an EPA grant. He feels the council
should have its say, but not be self-aggrandizing as they work toward a final
solution.
Annette Rummel, with the Convention and Visitors Bureaus in the Tri-Counties,
called on EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to listen to an official Community
Advisory Group that’s forming, rather than groups with a special interest.
The Lone Tree Council’s Michelle Hurd Riddick said there was a lot of energy
wasted on criticizing the council, rather than commenting on the proposed
agreement between Dow and the EPA. The council applied for a grant for the
adviser with the Tittabawassee River Watch and Bay County Sustainability
Society. Hurd Riddick said the adviser, Peter deFur of Environmental Stewardship
Concepts, will benefit all community members.
“He’s here for all the community, we just retained him,” she said. “He’s there
for everybody.”
Laura Burtt, a Tri-County resident, said the technical adviser is important and
will help the whole community by answering questions and interpreting documents.
“I feel it’s one of the most helpful things that’s come out of this so far,” she
said.
Dow spokeswoman Mary Draves said Dow wants to move forward with the EPA in
implementing an agreement once it is signed.
“We’re committed to a resolution,” she said.
To comment on the proposed agreement, visit
www.epa.gov/region5/publiccomment or e-mail
krause.patricia@epa.gov . People
also can fax comments to (312) 697-2568 or mail them to Partricia Krause,
Superfund Division (SI-7J), U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL
60604.
http://ourmidland.com/articles/2009/11/06/local_news/doc4af42dbccc062833261388.txt
For additional articles like this one, go to the Tittabawassee River Watch web site www.trwnews.net for complete coverage of the Tittabawassee River Dow Chemical dioxin contamination saga. . The Newspaper / Media page of our site contains an extensive archive of media articles dating back to January 2002. The source organization's web site link is listed to the right of the article, visit often for other news in our area. The Newspaper / Media page may be accessed by scrolling down to the bottom of the CONTENTS section and clicking on the Newspaper/Media link.